Public Service Renewal

Genuine renewal of the federal public service requires a new “moral contract” between the public service, ministers, and parliament in support of the values of a professional, non-partisan public service.
A new “moral contract” is required because the boundary between political and public service values has become blurred at the highest levels, a problem identified by the Gomery Commission, by the Public Accounts Committee of the House of Commons, by the political parties themselves, and by leading scholars. As recommended by numerous task forces, commissions and experts, a new “moral contract” should take the form of a Charter of Public Service, which both houses of parliament unanimously committed to establish, in 2005.
In this paper, Ralph Heintzman argues for the implementation of a Charter of Public Service, which will have at least four key pillars:

  1. the values and ethics of public service;
  2. strengthening the deputy minister’s role as accounting officer;
  3. reforming the process for the appointment of deputy ministers; and
  4. new rules for government communications.

The paper concludes with 29 specific policy recommendations. Download the paper in both French and English below.
Download PDF

A significant gesture

In announcing a meaningful plan to fight climate change, US President Obama has put forward one of the most significant acts of his presidency.

The objective announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce power plants carbon emissions by 30% by 2030 (compared to 2005 levels) represents the largest effort ever undertaken by the US government to tackle climate change. If the plan is implemented, it will mean a reduction of 500 million metric tons of carbon annually.
In the United States, 40% of emissions are produced by power plants (mainly coal). Yesterday’s announcement targets these plants directly by imposing a cap on their emissions levels that is essentially equivalent to setting a price on carbon.
Beyond the national dimension, the announcement will have a significant international impact. Because the United States and China are the two largest emitters of carbon across the world (accounting for almost 40% of total emissions), the message sent to the rest of the world is unequivocal. In advance of the 2015 World Summit in Paris, President Obama’s announcement will breathe new life into negotiations towards a new multilateral agreement. This is far from trivial, considering the inertia we have seen in recent years.
The direction just taken by the US government will also have an effect on market forces, likely provoking a major shift in the production, transmission and consumption of energy. Investment and jobs related to renewable energy such as solar, wind and biomass have already been increasing in recent years in the United States. We can expect this trend to be amplified as a result of the new regulation.
So, what are the consequences for Canada? Boasting an already unenviable reputation on the environmental front, the Harper government is now in an even more vulnerable situation. By refusing to put forward its own regulations on carbon emissions, Canada will find itself at a double disadvantage.
First, as we have seen in the Keystone pipeline fiasco, the lack of a concrete action plan on climate change undermines the export of heavy oil from Alberta’s oil sands. Thanks in part to a revolution in the exploration of natural gas, the United States now have the luxury of being more selective in importing energy. It is clear they prefer less polluting sources. If Canada had taken action on carbon sequestration or on industry regulation, we would not be in this situation.
Second, rather than becoming a world leader in energy research, development and innovation — and creating a market conducive to private investment — Canada is likely to be outdone by those countries that have recognized the economic potential of this shift.
In the future, economies with low carbon emissions will have a significant competitive advantage. Beyond the fight against climate change, this is what we must grasp about yesterday’s announcement. President Obama has understood.

Excellence and Equity in Skills and Higher Education in Canada

Canada has been a strong performer in post-secondary education and skills development for many years. On key measures we are at or near the top of international rankings and highly skilled Canadians contribute to economic prosperity, social innovation, and political and community well-being.
But there are signs that Canada’s performance may be deteriorating and, despite a commitment to equality, opportunities and achievement in skills and higher education have been poorly distributed across regions and groups. A new report from Canada 2020, Skills and Higher Education: Towards Excellence and Equity, reveals that we are not doing enough to achieve the levels of excellence and equity in skills and higher education we need to sustain a prosperous economy and fair society.
Download the full research report here.

Excellence

Consider excellence. Over 51 per cent of Canadians hold a university or college credential—versus an OECD average of 32 per cent—and another 12 per cent hold trades certificates. Canadian adults perform at or above the OECD average in literacy and problem-solving skills, and our 15 year olds—our future university and college graduates and skilled tradespeople—rank near the top in PISA scores in reading, math and science.
Still, our performance is weakening and competitors are catching up. Adult numeracy is below the OECD average, and given our world-leading rates of university and college attainment, scores in literacy and problem-solving should be much higher. We have too few people with advanced degrees (particularly PhDs), insufficient graduates from the STEM disciplines, deficits in essential, innovation and commercialization skills, and a poor track record on workplace training. Moreover, as Canadian PISA scores have declined in recent years, while those of key international competitors have improved, our next cohort of college and university students will have a weaker foundation for success.

Equity

We also need to think about equity. According to The Conference Board of Canada, Canada earns an “A” and ranks second among 16 peer countries for equity in reading scores between Canadian-born students who speak the language of the PISA test at home and Canadian-born second-generation students who do not. We also earn an “A” and rank third among peers for low differences in reading scores between students in the most and least economically disadvantaged schools in the country.
But these equity achievements deteriorate when we look at the education and skills attainment of Canadian adults through the lenses of region, Aboriginal status, gender, and immigration status.

  • British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario perform well both in educational attainment and scores in literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving skills. But other provinces and territories—particularly Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, and Nunavut—lag far behind.
  • By 2011, nearly 48 per cent of those who self-identify as Aboriginal held a university, college, or trade credential versus more than 63 per cent of non-Aboriginal Canadians—an attainment gap of over 15 per cent. The literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving skills of Aboriginals also lag those of non-Aboriginals—though, notably, similarly educated Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals achieve similar scores.
  • Among 25 to 34 year olds, 65 per cent of women hold university or college credentials versus 49 per cent of men. At the same time, women are still vastly underrepresented in many science and engineering disciplines, as well as skilled trades. In fact, differences in achievement between men and women begin to reveal themselves in the K-12 system, with girls outperforming boys in reading, but lagging in math.
  • Finally, while immigrants tend to have higher rates of post-secondary attainment than native-born Canadians, they struggle with deficits in literacy and communication skills, and experience weak employment and income prospects.

We ignore these inequities and the early signs of declining performance at our peril. Canadians need advanced skills to navigate an increasingly technology- and knowledge-intensive economy and society. Addressing persistent and complex policy challenges—such as weak innovation and productivity performance, climate change, inequality, health-care innovation, and the fairness and effectiveness of our political institutions—requires strong scientific, economic, cultural and political literacy, among both experts and ordinary citizens.

Improving Skills and Higher Education

To improve excellence and equity in skills and higher education, we should consider six policy options. These include making substantial investments in education and skills programs for Aboriginal youth and addressing the barriers they face to higher education. We should support programs to address gender differences in skills and higher education attainment, and improve credential recognition and skills development for immigrants. Employers must be encouraged to increase investments in training to fulfill their responsibilities for skills development.
Additionally, federal and provincial governments should work together to establish a national learning outcomes assessment program to track and improve the skills development performance of higher education institutions. Finally, the federal government should create and fund an independent, arms-length Canadian Council on Skills and Higher Education (CCSHE) to ensure that educators, employers, policy-makers and other stakeholders have access to independent expertise, research and advice to support their efforts to achieve greater excellence and equity in skills and higher education.
Canada needs to embark on an ambitious excellence and equity agenda for skills and higher education to sustain and enhance performance and to ensure that all Canadians are prepared to make meaningful contributions to economic prosperity, social and political well-being, and to achieve good lives for themselves and their families. We do well, but we can do much better.
Daniel Munro is Principal Research Associate, Centre for Skills and Post-Secondary Education at The Conference Board of Canada. His report for Canada 2020, “Skills and Higher Education in Canada: Towards Excellence and Equity” is available at https://canada2020.ca/publications/.

Skills and Higher Education in Canada

Canada’s performance in higher education and skills development has been fairly strong for many years. On key measures we are at or near the top of international rankings and our highly skilled people contribute to economic competitiveness, social innovation, and political and community well-being.
But there are troubling indications that Canada’s skills and education performance is deteriorating, that not enough is being done to address a range of economic and social problems, and that opportunities and benefits have been poorly distributed across regions and groups. In short, there are signs that we are not doing enough to achieve the high levels of skills excellence and equity we need. Action is needed to sustain and enhance the performance of higher education and skills development in Canada.
In this paper, Dan Munro explores two central needs to Canada’s skills problem: excellence, and equity.
Excellence means asking the question: is Canada producing graduates with the right skills to sustain and enhance the country’s economic competitiveness and social well-being?
And Equity means asking: Are some regions and groups being left behind?
Download PDF